This blog is from a term paper I wrote for a Church History class in Seminary. I felt like posting it not because of any exquisite genius on my part, but because I actually think the subject matter is important and interesting. That being said, I’d like to add a few disclaimers. First of all, there is a lot more to Francke, Pietism and this period of history and the theology being developed than I could ever hope to cover in a term paper or a blog. I’ve included my citations for further study if the interest is there. The lectures I cite were found on Itunes in the Itunes U section. I highly recommend that as a resource for any field of study. Another disclaimer, I don’t fully embrace everything about Francke and his Lutheran theology. In spite of these things, and in light of amazing life and time of Francke, I now leave it to you to decide about him for yourselves. I would love to here any thoughts or insights.

Historical Foundations of Pietism
There is much debate over how best to understand, interpret and teach the beginnings and movement known as Pietism in Christian history and historical theology. However, the majority would agree that, generally speaking, Pietism was a reaction of certain individuals in Germany in the sixteenth, seventeenth, and eighteenth centuries who developed a significant following which in subsequent generations took the movement in many different directions. The reaction was against Deism and Lutheran Orthodoxy. Deism was seen to be taking the Bible and Christ out of the church’s belief and practice, and Orthodoxy was removing the heart. Thus, the Pietists were in effect the second phase of the Reformation, a much needed phase to counteract the heartless clergy falling through the cracks of a government controlled church (James 2003).
The Pietists, though coming from different traditions, had similar themes of emphasis. Against laxity in spiritual fervor and morality, the Pieteists stressed conversion, the study of the Scriptures in small groups, the singing of hymns and prayer. They deemphasized doctrine, the creeds and certain particulars of theology. Their feeling toward doctrine turned on the belief that doctrine and careful theological thinking had not kept the church devotionally zealous. (Bingham 2002, 138)
Arndt
The known beginnings of Pietism, as tradition informs us, was through a man named Johann Arndt who lived from 1555-1621. At first determined to be a doctor, he ended up severally ill to the point of being bedridden, during which time he was able to read a lot of the Bible. Once his health returned, he took up the path of a pastor determined to reform what he saw to be a dying church. His major contribution was a book he wrote, True Christianity, which was inspired by the likes of Thomas a` Kempis’ The Imitation of Christ. While he planted many of the seeds of what would later come to be the Pietist movement, he is not considered the functional father of it, and for good reason (James 2003).
Spener
Philipp Jakob Spener, who lived from 1635-1705, is the real father of Pietism. Although he comes nearly a generation after Arndt, it was he who had a broad enough impact in ministry to effect a movement. After a substantial career as a tutor and academician, he was assigned a pastorate in Frankfurt Germany. Here he began to do things that were unheard of at his time. He be began to preach expositionally through the Bible book by book instead of topically. He put a heavy emphasis on a real experienced conversion and on holy living. A truly revolutionary practice he began at his church was to meet with the congregation in small groups for Bible study, groups he referred to as colleges of piety. It was his desire to bring about the simple Christian life, normal people practicing their faith every day in real ways. His legacy was primarily left behind in a book he wrote, inspired by Arndt, called Pia desideria, or Pious desires (James 2003). Here is a summary of that work.
After commenting on the prevailing moral laxity of both clergy and laity, he affirms the possibility of reform and sets forth six concrete proposals to achieve this:
- More extensive public and private reading and study of the Bible
- A renewed emphasis on the priesthood of all believers, which would insure the larger participation on the part of the laity
- The cultivation of the spiritual life through deeds of love to one’s neighbor and not just knowledge alone
- Avoidance of theological disputation
- A procedure for training the future ministers that would couple piety with learning by including devotional literature in the curriculum
- Encouragement of preaching that would have edification and the development of the inner man as its goal (Clouse 2002, 212)
Much could and has been said on Spener, but I intend to focus my attention on one of his followers who also was his successor in leading this movement (James 2003).
Francke
Born in the northern part of Germany to a prominent family, Augustus Hermann Francke grew up with the best education the seventeenth century could provide. His father, though passing when he was seven, had set up the educational path of his son such that it could be not be matched. His mother carried on this passion for education in her husband’s absence. This had such a profound affect on Francke that he preferred study to the normal activities of children. This intensity with regard to his young academic pursuit was only stifled by the death of his youngest sister, who was only three years older than him. She had given him his first copy of Arndt’s True Christianity, which left a great impression on him. After her death, and upon attending another school, Francke himself reflects that he began to be more concerned with academic achievement than with true faith, something that would plague him a long time. Francke grew immensely in his academic pursuits, all the while praying that God would take away his pride, help him be a true Christian, teach him how he should become a scholar, and help him make the knowledge useful to others.
When he was sixteen he attended many lectures at the University of Erfurt before receiving a scholarship at the University of Kiel in 1679. While his religious devotion surged during this time, he was still determined to obtain every earthly honor and comfort he could achieve by his gifts and power. He eventually grew dissatisfied with his lack of ability in the Hebrew language, and left the school he was in to study under a man named Ezra Edzardi in the city of Hamburg. Ezra told him to focus on the first four chapters of Genesis. Though he did not fully understand his teacher, he obeyed. It was not long before he realized that by following his teachers’ instruction he had mastered a third of the vocabulary of the Hebrew Bible. After only two months of study under Ezra, he returned home to Gotha for a year, in which time he read the Hebrew Bible seven times in order to master it. It was shortly after this in 1684 that he was invited to come to Leipzig and tutor a young theologian in Hebrew. He was so skilled at this endeavor, that he became a professor at Wittenberg in oriental languages, and was a very sought after instructor. Upon receiving his Masters degree, and growing in popularity, he began to do at the University what Spener had done in Frankfurt at his church, meeting privately with students in order to study the Bible. This small study grew so much that they ended up needing a bigger room. In 1687 he received another scholarship in the city of Luneburg, which he took, and which put him on the path he is now known for (Brown 1831, 15-24).
Spiritual Birth
Francke makes it clear, that even though he was a very skilled theologian and teacher of the Bible, it was not until he came to Luneberg that he had real faith. He describes the tension built up inside him like this:
I went in the fall of 1687 with great joy, since I hoped to achieve perfectly my chief task by doing so, namely to become a justified Christian. The external hindrances were now taken away at once by the dear God. I had a room to myself in which I could not be disturbed or distracted from good thought by anyone, and I took my meals with Christian and godly people.
I had hardly arrived when I was asked to present a sermon in the church of St. John, and I was asked to so a good time before the sermon was to be presented. My mind was in such a state that I was not only concerned with the mere preaching of a sermon but chiefly with the upbuilding of the congregation. Thinking on this, the text came to me; “this is written that you may believe that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God, and that believing, you may have life in his name” (John 20:31). With this text I had particular opportunity to discuss true living faith, and how this faith is distinguished from a mere human and imaginary foolish faith. (Erb 1983, 102)
Over the course of time preparing to preach this sermon, Francke cried out to God, whom he did not trust in, to save his soul. He confided in a friend what was going on, and his friend was very upset about it. Although the friend offered all kinds of help, Francke found no respite. It was not until late on the Saturday before he was to preach that discovered what he had been looking for.
On the following day, which was Sunday, I thought that I would likely lie again in my bed in my earlier unrest. I was also thinking that if no change arose I would not preach the sermon since I could not preach in unbelief and against my own heart and so deceive the people. I did not even know if it would be possible for me to do so. I felt very deeply what it is to have no God to whom the heart can hold, to whom it can confess its sins while not knowing where or who he was who brought forth tears, or if there truly was a God whom man had stirred to wrath. I also knew what it was to see the heart’s misery and great sorrow daily, and yet not know or understand any savior or any refuge. In such great dread I went once more upon my knees on the evening before the Sunday on which I was to preach. I cried to God, whom I still did not know nor trust, for salvation from such a miserable state [asking him to save me], if indeed he was a true God. The Lord, the living God, heard me from his throne while I yet knelt. So great was his fatherly love that he wished to take me finally, after such doubts and unrest of my heart, so that I might be more convinced that he could satisfy my well, and that my erring reason might be tamed, so as not to move against his power and faithfulness. He immediately heard me. My doubt vanished as quickly as one turns one’s hand; I was assured in my heart of the grace of God in Christ Jesus and I knew God not only as God but as my Father. All sadness and unrest of my heart was taken away at once, and I was immediately overwhelmed as with a stream of joy so that with full joy I praised and gave honor to God who had shown me such great grace. I arose a completely different person from the one who had knelt down. (Erb 1983, 104-105)
Francke went on to preach his sermon in confidence, and from that point on considered God’s honor and men’s salvation his primary tasks. He continued his studies at Luneberg, and started Bible studies like the ones at Leipzig. Francke would go on to take up appointments in Hamburg, Leipszig again, Erfurt and finally to where he spent the majority of his career and where he achieved the many things for which he now known in Halle.
Two items of interest in order to better understand his work at Halle, and his association with Pietism, are his activities in Hamburg and his residency with Spener and his family for a time. In February of 1688 he went to Hamburg and entered into many friendships which edified him greatly. One man, Nicholas Lange, engaged the subject of education with him, and influenced him to the point that he started a private school for children there. He gained experience in this endeavor that proved very profitable to his later undertakings. By the end of that year, in December, he was given a scholarship to wherever he wanted to go. It was at this point he decided to return to Leipzig and take up his calling there with his newly converted heart. However, he desired to visit a man who he had heard much about, Spener, and so it was that he came to stay with him and his family in Dresden for two months. Having shared his heart with Spener, he received full support from him, and was encouraged deeply.
In his tenure at Leipzig and other places, he faced constant persecution from the Orthodox clergy of his time. He had preaching and teaching appointments everywhere he went, and made many friends, drew large crowds, and faced increasing opposition, being called a heretic, a hypocrite, a sect leader and a fanatic. At Erfurt, his critics managed to get the government to kick him out of his church. But such was the providence of God that while one government was kicking him out, another at Brandenburg was inviting him in. Shortly after, he received the invitation to preach at St. George church in Glaucha, and teach Greek and Hebrew at the new found University of Halle in 1692 (Brown 1881, 41-54).

The Halle Legacy
As a professor, Francke started out doing introductory courses, getting some branches of study started before the newly founded University was officially consecrated (72). Spener had much to do with the formation of the school and the faculty that were chosen, and as such, the entire operation came under harsh scrutiny by many clergy and professors at home and abroad (73-74). Francke took up his task, refusing to leave because he felt called. He taught Biblical languages until 1699 when he took up the task of Theology where he remained unto his dying day (81). During the course Francke’s studies he became well versed in many ancient languages, many European languages, some Asian languages, history, philosophy and rhetoric. What set him apart was his knowledge of the Bible, which in that time was a secondary concern in the study of the ministry. This coupled with his insistence on pious living made him a leader above all others (81-82).
The object to which Francke devoted himself, in his professional labour, was to give a more practical character to the theology of the age, and to the Bible its proper standing, as the only rule of faith and doctrine. To secure these most desirable results, he made the Scriptures, in some form or other, the subjects of most of his lectures; not merely giving a cold, and formal explanation of its truths, but applying them to the hearts and consciences of his pupils, and teaching them how they should apply the same truths to others. (82-83)
He also continued to have his Bible studies like he had done at other times. At Halle, however, these took a different and deeper nature, as one of these groups were of advanced students who received special instruction for becoming pastors and professors in the future (85). He also began to write more extensively. One project which brought with a special amount of criticism was a work called Biblical Observations, which he released in a monthly periodical form that sought to correct some of the mistakes of Luther’s translation of the German Bible (87). While these were his undertakings and trials as a professor, the problems only compounded for him as a pastor.
The Church at Glaucha
When Francke started, the congregation was in shambles, having no real knowledge of the Bible, no commitment to faith, and engaging in all manner of vices and fleshly pursuits. “He spent no time in useless discussions, but declared in all the variety of the bearings, the great doctrines of man’s depravity, and salvation through faith in the Lord Jesus Christ” (56). Thus he preached with a bent towards love, but did not hide the doom of the unbeliever or sinner. On top of his preaching, every morning and evening he held meetings in his home where they studied the Bible (64). He also wrote tracts for his people on holy living and answering questions about the Bible (66-70).
Francke and his colleagues at Halle were so successful in attracting large crowds and seeing many conversions of those who thought of themselves as Christians only to find out they had been faking it, that it caused a stir among other clergy and many bitter complaints were made about them to the local government. The court of Magdeburg stood up for the Pietists and ruled that opposition to them should cease (74). This, however, did not stop the onslaught of slander against them. The court again had to rule in their favor, warning their critics that only in an instance of clear heresy could anything be done to stop them (75). Complicating matters were those who claimed to be following Francke and the ministers at Halle, who were in fact heretical and fanatical, which kept the rain of criticism coming steadily upon them (76-77). This ultimately lead to a government investigation against them, which lead to them being deemed not guilty of false doctrine, but forced them to have Bible studies in the church and not in their houses. Francke and his party gladly accepted the terms in order to find peace with their fellow clergy, though their opponents were not satisfied (78-79). Regardless, Francke maintained his preaching and practice in full force until he gained an associate to take on some of the duties in 1714 (80). If being a professor and pastor were not enough to keep him busy and stir up unrest around him, he pushed even further to meet needs he saw around him and brought more criticism upon himself.
The Orphanage
In Halle there was the practice of the poor coming to houses of those willing to give them some food or money at appointed times. In 1694 Francke began to notice the state of the children, who were growing up in dangerous situations with minimal physical means of survival. So one day he brought them into his house to see what the understood about the Bible. After that time he invited them back every week in order to give them some alms and teach them about the Faith. His efforts slowly grew to the point where he began to raise money in order to support it. He soon had a teacher come part time to help, and then many were sending their children to him because of the quality of the education. In 1709 he had twenty instructors, seventy students and a growing reputation. The poor students that came would receive alms, and the others were giving sums of money as they were willing or able. Soon, he was receiving such large donations that he attained other buildings and developed his programs further, having been using his own house and much of his own means to keep the effort going to this point. Through his development of this orphan house and school, he found that at many times he was short of the funds needed to continue, and would pray ceaselessly for the needs to be met. There are endless accounts of last minute donations being made, sometimes on a daily basis, in order for the needs of the ministry to be met. All the while he faced criticism of getting rich off this work, and of being prideful. In spite of it all he continued this effort alongside his pastoral and professorial work. By 1730 the student base was five-hundred (101-155).
Private Life
Francke was married shortly after coming to Halle, and had three children. The first died as a baby. The second, his son, followed him becoming a professor of Theology and director of the Orphan House. The third was a daughter who grew up and lived a happy life. Not much is known about his family life, other than that it was a pleasant experience to visit them, and that he never let the conversation wander or be about anything uninteresting or impractical. He also would get his grandchildren to read from the Bible before dinner.
He produced nearly a book a year, in the midst of his other duties, and kept a large amount of correspondence. He also would select students from Halle to be missionaries, primarily in India where the King of Denmark had some settlements and was eager to have mission work done there. In 1705, after years of much exertion and upon the death of Spener, his health began to suffer. He was told to travel to alleviate his problems and did so. He took guest preaching and speaking appointments everywhere he went, and gained many friends to himself and his cause in the process. Though he returned healthy after three months, in 1717 he again began to struggle. This time he traveled for a long time to the outskirts of Prussia, being both received and rejected from place to place, again making many friends and supporters along the way. Eventually he contracted an illness that took his life in June of 1727 (152-180).
Concluding Remarks
While Pietism in general tended to deemphasize doctrine too much, in Francke I see a balance set apart from the rest of Pietism (James 2003). I have found much of the criticisms leveled against the entire movement only applicable to certain streams or people within it (Olson 2009). Even the Moravians under Zinzendorf were considered deviant by the Halle school after only a short time from their organized formation because of differences in doctrine and practice (Calhoun 2006). In the life of Francke I have found much of what current trends from both liberal and conservative circles in popular higher Christian education seem to be looking for. On the one side concern for the poor and destitute, better education and holistic social reform are a high priority. On the other, deep devotional practices, sound and thorough theological training for all ages, and commitment to fellowship and Bible study reign supreme. Thus, I argue that Francke be set apart from the Pietist stream as his life proves relevant and balanced for any generation, and this because of his commitment to evangelical faith and Biblical theology.
Works Cited
Bingham, Jeffrey. 2002. Pocket History of the Church. Downers Grove: InterVarsity Press.
Brown, Rezeau. 1831. Memoirs of Augustus Hermann Francke. Philadelphia: American Sunday School Union.
Calhoun, David. 2006. Classroom lecture, CTS, St. Louis, MO. Spring.
Clouse, Robert G. Richard V. Pierard and Edwin M. Yamauchi. 2002. The Story of the Church. London: Moody Press.
Erb, Peter C. ed. 1983. Pietists: Selected writings.Mahwah: Paulist Press.
James, Frank. A. 2003. 0HT504 Classroom lecture, RTS, Orlando, FL.
Olsen, Roger 2009. Conference speaker, Bethel University, 21 March: “Pietism: Myths and Realities.”






